How the US Government Really Works: A Blunt Look

This piece takes a look at how the United States government operates, particularly when it comes to agreements and promises made by the president. It suggests a system where trust is placed in the president’s ability to push things through Congress, but often, these promises don’t materialize as expected.

• The US government often relies on the president signing agreements, expecting Congress to follow suit.
• Congressional approval can take years, or may never happen at all.
• This delay can lead to situations where one party implements an agreement while the other doesn’t.
• There’s a perception that some officials exploit these delays.
• A small number of politicians are seen as exceptions to a general trend of corruption or self-interest within government.

The typical way things work in the US government often boils down to a matter of trust. The president might sign an agreement, saying, "Trust us, we’ll get this through Congress." The idea is that one side goes ahead and starts putting the agreement into action, with the expectation that the legislative branch will eventually catch up and approve it. It’s like a leap of faith, hoping that the gears of government will turn smoothly.

But here’s where the wheels often come off. That "push through Congress" part? It rarely happens as smoothly as planned. Instead, Congress might end up mulling over the agreement for years – five, ten years, or even longer. And sometimes, the final decision is a resounding "no."

While Congress is busy debating or delaying, the side that already started implementing the agreement is left in limbo. They might think, "Well, we really, really wanted to do this, but you know, those folks in Congress just wouldn’t sign off." This creates a situation where one party might feel taken advantage of, with the excuse being, "Oh, did we take advantage of you? Well, you know, it happens." This kind of scenario seems to be a constant feature of the political landscape.

It’s suggested that within Washington D.C., there are very few individuals who operate differently. The vast majority, according to this view, are not acting in the best interest of the public. There are exceptions, of course. Some might be running for president or governor, like Marjorie Taylor Greene. But for the most part, the sentiment is that a huge percentage of the American government are seen as self-serving, perhaps even corrupt.