How Zionist Control Is Finally Being Exposed On a Global Level!

The Israel-Gaza conflict is being called one of the most misunderstood events in modern history. What’s really going on, and why are we only now able to talk about it openly?

Key Takeaways

• The October 7th events acted as a catalyst for open discussion about the Israel-Gaza conflict.
• Youth are increasingly siding with Palestine, challenging traditional media narratives.
• Concerns exist about the influence of a powerful group with significant wealth and positions in Western governments, potentially prioritizing loyalty to each other and Israel over their host nations.
• Social media platforms, particularly TikTok, have played a role in spreading information and shaping public opinion, leading to attempts to control the narrative.
• Both Israelis and Palestinians have a right to exist, and a resolution requires addressing the Palestinian right to self-determination.

The Israel-Gaza Conflict: A Misunderstood Event

For a long time, the Israel-Gaza conflict has been shrouded in a narrative that many feel doesn’t tell the whole story. It’s been described as one of the most misunderstood events in modern history. The question arises: why is it that discussions about this topic, which might have been labeled as conspiracy theories in the past, are now happening more openly? Events like Candace Owens facing a ban from Australia for her rhetoric, or students being deported from the US for criticizing Israel, highlight a perceived double standard. Burning an American flag might be overlooked, but burning an Israeli flag can lead to deportation. This shift in public discourse seems to be directly linked to what happened on October 7th.

October 7th: The Catalyst for Change

The events of October 7th are seen as a turning point. When people witnessed the casualties, particularly the children, it seems many were "red-pilled" – gaining a new, often stark, understanding of the situation. After learning more about the history, a significant number of people, especially the youth, have come to believe that what’s happening is a genocide and that Israel is in the wrong. The traditional media’s grip on the narrative has weakened, and this has led to a sense of panic among those who previously controlled the information flow.

The Influence of Power and Wealth

There’s a perspective that a group with considerable influence, power, and wealth holds positions of authority in many Western countries. This group is perceived by some as being more loyal to each other than to their host nations. Historically, they have faced ostracization and expulsion from various societies, leading to a reliance on each other. This dynamic, some argue, has led to them subverting host nations through nepotism and favorable practices to ensure their own protection and advancement. This has, in turn, culminated in the formation and support of the state of Israel. The argument is that individuals in positions of power in countries like America, Canada, Australia, and the UK often prioritize Israel’s interests, lobbying with significant financial resources and securing positions to ensure continuous support, weapons, and resources for Israel, even at the potential expense of their own nations.

Social Media and the Shifting Narrative

For decades, the narrative surrounding the conflict was largely controlled by mainstream media. However, the rise of social media platforms has changed this dynamic. Platforms like TikTok have become powerful tools for disseminating information, and in the case of the Israel-Gaza conflict, they have been instrumental in showing unfiltered content. Videos of suffering, beheadings, and people burning in real-time have reached audiences who were previously shielded from such realities. This direct exposure has led many, especially younger generations who weren’t indoctrinated by the "war on terror" narratives, to question the official story. The viral spread of Osama bin Laden’s "Letter to America" in late 2023, which detailed grievances against the West, including its support for Israel, further fueled this awakening. This letter, previously suppressed by mainstream media, resonated with a new audience looking for explanations.

The TikTok Ban and Narrative Control

The growing pro-Palestine sentiment on platforms like TikTok, which reportedly favored Palestine by a 70-30 margin, became a major concern for pro-Zionist groups. Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL and others publicly stated the need to address TikTok. While discussions about banning TikTok due to its Chinese origins had occurred before, the renewed push coincided with the rising anti-Israel sentiment. This has led to the perception that Israel’s national security is being prioritized over America’s. The eventual sale of TikTok to American entities, like Larry Ellison, a major donor to the IDF, and the subsequent implementation of stricter content moderation, including bans on phrases like "Free Palestine" and watermelon emojis, are seen as attempts to regain narrative control. The appointment of former IDF Unit 8200 members to key positions within these platforms further solidifies this view.

The Right to Exist: A Two-Sided Coin

At the heart of the conflict is the question of existence. Israel’s argument is that it has a right to defend itself, having faced persecution and expulsion throughout history, and now having its own homeland. However, the counter-argument is that the Palestinians also have a right to exist and to self-determination. The current situation is seen by many as an illegal occupation and an apartheid ethnostate where Palestinians are denied basic rights. The historical context, including the 1947 partition plan, the 1967 war, and the ongoing occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, is crucial to understanding the current grievances. The argument is that true peace will only be achieved when Israel recognizes the Palestinians’ right to self-determination, whether through a one-state or two-state solution. Without this, the cycle of conflict is likely to continue, as the perceived denial of one group’s right to exist fuels the desire of the other group to destroy the oppressor’s ability to exist.