Additional information
| Author | Nicholas Perricone |
|---|
The Perricone Promise
By Nicholas Perricone (2003)
What the internet says
Aggregated insights from reviews and discussions across the web.
Overall reception: Mixed reception
The Perricone Promise receives mixed reception online, with readers divided on its scientific credibility and practical value. On Goodreads, the book holds a 3.61 rating from 246 ratings, with 36% giving it 3 stars and significant portions both praising (27% gave 4 stars) and criticizing it (14% gave 2 stars). Amazon reviews show similar polarization. Supporters appreciate the nutritional advice and find the anti-inflammatory theory of aging interesting, while skeptics question the lack of peer-reviewed research citations and view the book as an extended advertisement for Perricone's expensive product line. The book's core message about diet affecting skin health resonates with many readers, particularly recommendations around salmon, antioxidants, and reducing sugar intake.
What readers loved
- Provides accessible information about inflammation theory of aging and how diet affects skin health
- Includes practical recipes that readers found healthy and easy to follow, particularly the salmon and vegetable-based meals
- Offers credible nutritional advice about antioxidants, omega-3 fatty acids, and avoiding refined sugars that aligns with broader health research
- Presents complex scientific concepts about free radicals and cell damage in understandable language for general readers
- Some readers report visible improvements in skin appearance when following the dietary recommendations
- The three-day diet protocol provides a quick-start approach that appeals to readers wanting immediate results
Common critiques
- Lacks citations to peer-reviewed scientific studies despite claims of 'two decades of research' - one reviewer found no published research under Perricone's name addressing the book's main claims
- Reads like an infomercial for Perricone's expensive skincare and supplement products, with the final sections heavily promoting his $300/month product line
- Makes questionable claims that lack scientific substantiation, including assertions that vegetarians age faster than meat-eaters
- Recommends an excessive amount of daily supplements that raises safety concerns about vitamin toxicity
- The title 'Promise' sets unrealistic expectations that the book cannot deliver on its wrinkle-cure claims
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.